rejecting Petitioners' argument that the court retained jurisdiction to review whether they had been "ordered removed" based on Petitioners' contention that the removal orders were invalid
Summary of this case from Hidalgo-Mejia v. PittsNo. 16–812.
04-17-2017
Rosa Elida CASTRO, et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
rejecting Petitioners' argument that the court retained jurisdiction to review whether they had been "ordered removed" based on Petitioners' contention that the removal orders were invalid
Summary of this case from Hidalgo-Mejia v. Pittsrejecting Petitioners' argument that court retained jurisdiction to review whether they had been "ordered removed" based on Petitioners' contention that the removal orders were invalid
Summary of this case from Bansci v. NielsenFull title:Rosa Elida CASTRO, et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND…
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Apr 17, 2017
If the petitioner satisfies step-one, only then does the court move to step-two to "consider whether the…
Thuraissigiam v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.533 U.S. at 336–37, 121 S.Ct. 2271. Of the federal courts of appeals, only the Third Circuit has addressed…