Opinion
3:23cv342
11-06-2024
MARIO CASTRO, Plaintiff v. CHRISTOPHER DEBIAS, a law enforcement officer now or formerly working for the Borough of Hazleton, Pennsylvania, in his personal capacity only, Defendant
ORDER
JULIA K. MUNLEY JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
AND NOW, this 6th day of November 2024, for the reasons set forth in an accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1) Defendant's motion for partial reconsideration, (Doc. 29), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
2) Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the extent that defendant, in support of summary judgment, may file sealed original copies of the bodycam videos and unsealed versions muting the first and last name of the individual involved in an earlier incident with the plaintiff;
3) Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects;
4) Defendant shall file the following on or before November 22, 2024: 1) “a separate, short and concise statement of the material facts, in numbered paragraphs, as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried,” in compliance with the Middle District of Pennsylvania Rules of Court (“Local Rules”), M.D.PA. L.R. 56.1; 2) all video and documentary exhibits in support of the converted motion for summary judgment; and 3) a brief in support; and
5) Plaintiff shall file the following on or before December 13, 2024: 1) “a separate, short and concise statement of the material facts, responding to the numbered paragraphs set forth in [defendant's] statement. . ., as to which it is contended that there exists a genuine issue to be tried[,]” M.D.PA. L.R. 56.1; 2) all video and documentary exhibits in opposition to the converted motion for summary judgment; and 3) a brief in opposition.