From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Crow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 17, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19cv339 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19cv339

03-17-2020

CLAUDIO CASTRO v. MICHAEL B. CROW, ET AL.


ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Claudio Castro, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable orders of this court.

Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction (doc. no. 4). The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the motion be denied as moot because plaintiff was transferred to a different prison unit after he filed his motion. See Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubock County, 929 F.2d 1078,1084 (5th Cir. 1991).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed a document entitled objections.

If objections are filed, the court is required to conduct a de novo review of the objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, in his objections (doc. no. 21), plaintiff states that in light of his transfer to a new unit, he no longer seeks a preliminary injunction and asks that his motion be denied. In addition, plaintiff asserts that his transfer does not provide a basis for dismissing this lawsuit.

The court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation regarding the motion. Plaintiff's transfer to a new unit rendered his motion for preliminary injunctive relief moot. The court also agrees with plaintiff's assertion that his transfer does not provide a basis for dismissal of this lawsuit.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.

SIGNED this 17th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Castro v. Crow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Mar 17, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19cv339 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Castro v. Crow

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIO CASTRO v. MICHAEL B. CROW, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Mar 17, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19cv339 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2020)