From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Castro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 30, 2022
352 So. 3d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Nos. 3D21-2235 3D21-2236.

11-30-2022

Maria Victoria CASTRO, Appellant, v. Luz Marina CASTRO, Appellee.

Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant. Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko , for appellee. Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.


Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant. Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko , for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007) ("When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment.") see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ("[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact.").


Summaries of

Castro v. Castro

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 30, 2022
352 So. 3d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Castro v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:Maria Victoria CASTRO, Appellant, v. Luz Marina CASTRO, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

352 So. 3d 437 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)