From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Castro

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Nov 30, 2022
No. 3D21-2235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-2235 3D21-2236

11-30-2022

Maria Victoria Castro, Appellant, v. Luz Marina Castro, Appellee.

Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant. Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-1719, 19-2235 Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.

Ellis Law Group, P.L., and Jordan R. Hammer (Boca Raton), for appellant.

Golden Glasko & Associates, P.A., and William H. Glasko, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) ("When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment.") see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986) ("[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact.").


Summaries of

Castro v. Castro

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Nov 30, 2022
No. 3D21-2235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Castro v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:Maria Victoria Castro, Appellant, v. Luz Marina Castro, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

No. 3D21-2235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2022)