From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 8, 2009
Case No. 8:08-cv-769-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Jul. 8, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 8:08-cv-769-T-33TGW.

July 8, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 21), entered on June 9, 2009, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying social security disability benefits and supplemental security income payments be affirmed. As of this date, neither party has filed an objection to the report and recommendation, and the time for the parties to file such objections has elapsed.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: ACCEPTED ADOPTED. AFFIRMED.

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 21), entered on June 9, 2009, is and (2) The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying benefits is (3) The clerk is directed to close this case and to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner reflecting that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits and supplemental security income payments is affirmed. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Castro v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 8, 2009
Case No. 8:08-cv-769-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Jul. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Castro v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:NORMA CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jul 8, 2009

Citations

Case No. 8:08-cv-769-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Jul. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Nettles v. Astrue

Therefore, a longitudinal clinical record is generally important for the assessment of severity and expected…

Lewis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The Court therefore rejects these assignments of error. See Gonsalves v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No.…