From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castro v. AABC Constr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 27, 2022
17-CV-1205 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 27, 2022)

Opinion

17-CV-1205 (VSB)

09-27-2022

RICARDO CASTRO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AABC CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On November 12, 2021, in advance of a scheduled jury trial, Defendant Daniel Sheeri filed a proposed motion in limine. (Doc. 118.) On April 22, 2022, Defendants informed me that they no longer intended to defend the case at trial, (Doc. 141), and Plaintiffs now intend to seek a default judgment against Defendants, (see Doc. 154.) Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the proposed motion in limine, (Doc. 118), is DENIED without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the open motion at Doc. 118.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Castro v. AABC Constr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 27, 2022
17-CV-1205 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Castro v. AABC Constr.

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO CASTRO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AABC CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 27, 2022

Citations

17-CV-1205 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 27, 2022)