From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castone Corp. v. Advanced Cast Stone, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 16, 2012
Civil No. 1:10CV287-HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:10CV287-HSO-JMR

03-16-2012

CASTONE CORPORATION PLAINTIFF v. ADVANCED CAST STONE, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS ADVANCED CAST STONE, INC. CROSS-CLAIMANT/ CROSS-DEFENDANT v. ADDISON CONSTRUCTION, et al. CROSS-DEFENDANTS/ CROSS-CLAIMANTS


FINAL JUDGMENT

The cross-claim of Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., against Addison Construction, COM ADD JV, and Commercial Contracting Corporation, and the cross-claim of COM ADD JV against Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., having come on for trial before the Court and a jury beginning on the 12th day of March, 2012, and concluding on the 16th day of March, 2012, Honorable Halil Suleyman Ozerden, United States District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried, and the jury having heard all of the evidence and argument of counsel and receiving instructions of the Court, including a Special Verdict Form, having retired to consider their verdict, returned upon their oaths, into open Court, the following unanimous verdict, to wit:

Question Number One:

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendants Addison Construction, COM ADD JV, and Commercial Contracting Corporation breached the contract with Plaintiff Advanced Cast Stone, Inc.?
Please answer yes or no: Yes

Question Number Two:

What amount of money, if any, do you find by a preponderance of the evidence would adequately compensate Plaintiff Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., for its damages, if any?
Answer in dollars and cents, if any, or answer "none."
$68,486.00

Question Number Three:

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., breached its contract with Defendant COM ADD JV?
Please answer yes or no: No

Question Number Four:

Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., breached the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing owed to Defendant COM ADD JV, with respect to the contract at issue here?
Please answer yes or no: No

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., shall recover a Judgment from Addison Construction, COM ADD JV, and Commercial Contracting Corporation in the total amount of $68,486.00 in damages.

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that all claims by COM ADD JV against Advanced Cast Stone, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that in accordance with the prior rulings, Orders, and Stipulations, entered in this cause, all other claims by all other parties are hereby DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 16th day of March, 2012.

_______________

HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Castone Corp. v. Advanced Cast Stone, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 16, 2012
Civil No. 1:10CV287-HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Castone Corp. v. Advanced Cast Stone, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CASTONE CORPORATION PLAINTIFF v. ADVANCED CAST STONE, INC., et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 1:10CV287-HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss. Mar. 16, 2012)