From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castleman v. Wright

Appellate Court of Illinois
Mar 8, 1948
334 Ill. App. 74 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,577. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed March 8, 1948 Released for publication April 5, 1948

JUDGMENTS, § 5.1contradictory affidavits on motion for summary judgment. In action to recover balance due on account of materials alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant, motion for summary judgment was properly denied, where affidavits in support of motion set out several mutually contradictory statements of alleged facts, since purpose of summary judgment procedure is to ascertain whether issue exists to be determined by trier of facts.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. L.E. WILHITE, Judge, presiding.

Appeal dismissed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1948.

Rolla Babcook, for appellant;

Hugh J. Dobbs, for appellee;

Gillespie, Burke Gillespie, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed March 8, 1948; released for publication April 5, 1948.


Summaries of

Castleman v. Wright

Appellate Court of Illinois
Mar 8, 1948
334 Ill. App. 74 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Castleman v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:Charles F. Castleman, Trading as Charles F. Castleman Timber Company…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Mar 8, 1948

Citations

334 Ill. App. 74 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
78 N.E.2d 341

Citing Cases

Spencer v. Hibernia Bank

Second, this count fails in the void of its silence upon any reorganization of Hibernia subsequent to the…

Kamberos v. Schuster

No other counter-affidavits were filed. • 5-7 The primary function of a motion for summary judgment is to…