From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castle v. Serrano

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 27, 2022
2:21-cv-01994-JVS (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01994-JVS (MAR)

09-27-2022

SYLEE CASTLE, Plaintiff, v. A. SERRANO, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Claim One against Lugo;

(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Claim Five against Coleman;

(3) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Claim Four against Coleman; and

(4) Lugo is TERMINATED as a Defendant.


Summaries of

Castle v. Serrano

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 27, 2022
2:21-cv-01994-JVS (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Castle v. Serrano

Case Details

Full title:SYLEE CASTLE, Plaintiff, v. A. SERRANO, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01994-JVS (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2022)