From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castle v. Knowles

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 23, 2009
No. CV 1-08-01267-JAT (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV 1-08-01267-JAT.

September 23, 2009


ORDER


Pending before this Court is Defendants Knowles, Fisher, and Phillips' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 19), and Plaintiff Sy Lee Castle's Motion to Amend (Doc. # 23). This is Plaintiff's first request to amend his complaint. As such, Plaintiff is permitted to amend his complaint as a matter of right, notwithstanding Defendants' pending motion to dismiss. Schreiber Distrib. Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co., 806 F.2d 1393, 1401 (9th Cir. 1986).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Knowles, Fisher, and Phillips' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 19) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Sy Lee Castle's Motion to Amend (Doc. # 23) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file Plaintiff's lodged First Amended Complaint (Doc. # 25). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to respond to Plaintiff's amended complaint.


Summaries of

Castle v. Knowles

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 23, 2009
No. CV 1-08-01267-JAT (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Castle v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:Sy Lee Castle, Plaintiff, v. M. Knowles, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Sep 23, 2009

Citations

No. CV 1-08-01267-JAT (D. Ariz. Sep. 23, 2009)