From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castle McCulloch, Inc. v. Freedman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 4, 2005
360 N.C. 57 (N.C. 2005)

Summary

affirming award of sanctions against the plaintiff in a UDTP action when the plaintiff failed to present evidence of damages despite the plaintiff's claim surviving summary judgment

Summary of this case from Blyth v. McCrary

Opinion

No. 241A05.

Filed November 4, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 169 N.C. App. 497, 610 S.E.2d 416 (2005), affirming a judgment entered on 17 March 2003 and an order entered on 16 July 2003 by Judge William Z. Wood, Jr. in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 October 2005.

Douglas S. Harris for plaintiff-appellant. Elliot Pishko Morgan, P.A., by David C. Pishko and J. Griffin Morgan, for defendant-appellees.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Castle McCulloch, Inc. v. Freedman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 4, 2005
360 N.C. 57 (N.C. 2005)

affirming award of sanctions against the plaintiff in a UDTP action when the plaintiff failed to present evidence of damages despite the plaintiff's claim surviving summary judgment

Summary of this case from Blyth v. McCrary
Case details for

Castle McCulloch, Inc. v. Freedman

Case Details

Full title:CASTLE McCULLOCH, INC. v. DONALD LEE FREEDMAN, D/B/A FREEDMAN ASSOCIATES…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 4, 2005

Citations

360 N.C. 57 (N.C. 2005)

Citing Cases

Shepard v. Bonita Vista Properties, L.P.

The award or denial of attorney's fees under section 75-16.1 is within the sole discretion of the trial…

Shepard v. Bonita Vista Prop

The award or denial of attorney's fees under section 75-16.1 is within the sole discretion of the trial…