Opinion
Case No. SC05-582.
September 20, 2005.
Because petitioner has filed the instant pro se petition while represented by counsel, the petition for writ of prohibition is hereby dismissed as unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 473 (Fla. 2003) (announcing that the Court will no longer entertain pro se extraordinary writ petitions from criminal defendants seeking affirmative relief in the context of pending criminal cases when a petitioner is clearly represented by counsel and there is no indication of seeking to discharge counsel).
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., would request a response.