From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2016
NO. 2:15-cv-06329-CAS-KS (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 2:15-cv-06329-CAS-KS

09-26-2016

JUAN CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court concludes that the arguments, including disputed facts, presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: September 26, 2016

/s/_________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Castillo v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2016
NO. 2:15-cv-06329-CAS-KS (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Castillo v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2016

Citations

NO. 2:15-cv-06329-CAS-KS (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)