From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Lira & Mercado, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 1, 2011
Case No.: CV 10-05189 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV 10-05189 SBA

11-01-2011

DANIEL CASTILLO Plaintiff v. LIRA & MERCADO, INC.; ARTHUR MERCADO and ALEJANDRO LIRA; Defendants


ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;

COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION

TO ENFORCE PAYMENT

AGREEMENT


ORDER

Based on the stipulation of counsel and good cause shown, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. All deadlines are hereby terminated. The parties have reached a settlement through counsel. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the payment provision of the settlement until March 9, 2012. At that time, the Court directs the clerk to close the file. This Order is without waiving the ability of any party to move to enforce other provisions of the settlement agreement if there is a breach by separate legal proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By. Saundra D. Armstrong

United States District Court


Summaries of

Castillo v. Lira & Mercado, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 1, 2011
Case No.: CV 10-05189 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Castillo v. Lira & Mercado, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL CASTILLO Plaintiff v. LIRA & MERCADO, INC.; ARTHUR MERCADO and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 1, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV 10-05189 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2011)