From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Harper

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01181-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01181-JLT (PC)

08-16-2021

JOSE G. CASTILLO Plaintiff, v. JEAN HARPER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Doc. 1) 21-DAY DEADLINE

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jose G. Castillo, appearing pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint. (Doc. 1.) The pleading appears frivolous on its face. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed and have the Court screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee or seek to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court advises that, if Plaintiff chooses to proceed and if the complaint is deemed frivolous, his filing fee will not be refunded, or if he seeks to proceed IFP, he may be obligated to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, within 21 days, the Plaintiff SHALL pay the filing fee, apply to proceed IFP, or file a notice of dismissal. /// /// /// /// ///

Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Castillo v. Harper

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01181-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Castillo v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:JOSE G. CASTILLO Plaintiff, v. JEAN HARPER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 16, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01181-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2021)