From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
1:11-cv-01289-LJO-BAM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01289-LJO-BAM (HC)

10-31-2011

DAVID MARTINEZ CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. M. D. BITER, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING


(DOCUMENT #14)


THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 20, 2011, respondent filed a motion to extend time to file a responsive pleading. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Respondent is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file a responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Castillo v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
1:11-cv-01289-LJO-BAM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Castillo v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MARTINEZ CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. M. D. BITER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01289-LJO-BAM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)