From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castillo v. Baez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02958-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02958-LTB

12-18-2012

CHRIS CASTILLO, and SHEREE DILL, Plaintiffs, v. LOUIE BAEZ, JOSEPH D. ROMERO, and CHRISTIE J. CZAJKOWSKI, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

On December 17, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Rule 7.2 Motion, ECF No. 10, a Motion for Clarification, ECF No. 11, and two Motions and Affidavits for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, ECF Nos. 9 and 12. The action was dismissed without prejudice on December 17, 2012, for failure to cure deficiencies within the time allowed. Even considering the filings submitted on December 17, 2012, Plaintiffs still have failed to cure all deficiencies. Nothing in the Court's November 13, 2012, requires clarification. If Plaintiffs desire to pursue their claims they must do so by initiating a new action. All pending motions are denied as moot.


Summaries of

Castillo v. Baez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02958-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Castillo v. Baez

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS CASTILLO, and SHEREE DILL, Plaintiffs, v. LOUIE BAEZ, JOSEPH D…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 18, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02958-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 18, 2012)