From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casterlin v. Mullin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1966
26 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

July 5, 1966


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to declare void an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Newburgh, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered May 25, 1965, which granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition. Appeal dismissed, with costs. In this proceeding petitioners have appealed from a decision of Special Term, dated March 30, 1965. They have failed to appeal from the order thereon, entered May 25, 1965, which granted the motion. Hence, this court does not have jurisdiction to review Special Term's order. We nevertheless note that, were Special Term's order before us for review, we would affirm on the ground assigned by Special Term ( Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N.Y. 97; Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 6 A.D.2d 886, affd. 8 N.Y.2d 1065; Matter of Iraci v. Harwood, 6 A.D.2d 815). Beldock, P.J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Casterlin v. Mullin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1966
26 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Casterlin v. Mullin

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH S. CASTERLIN et al., Appellants, v. JOSEPH X. MULLIN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Wyndover Woods Prop. v. Town of Greenburgh

We apply the law as it stands at the time of this appeal. There is now an ordinance governing the matters in…

People ex Rel. Breedan v. Zelker

Judgment affirmed, without costs. The notice of appeal states that the appeal is taken from the decision of…