Opinion
December Term, 1902.
Ernest P. Seelman and Antonio Madeo, for the appellants.
Henry M. Heymann, for the respondent.
This action was brought to foreclose certain mechanics' liens for work and labor performed by the plaintiff and his assignor. It was tried before a referee, and there was a conflict of evidence upon the issues presented by the pleadings, which the referee has resolved in favor of the plaintiff, judgment being entered in his behalf. We are of opinion that the findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and concur in the conclusions of law, in so far as they relate to the personal claim of the plaintiff.
It is, however, established by authority that in the absence of a valid lien there can be no personal judgment in actions of this character. ( Dudley v. Congregation, etc., of St. Francis, 138 N.Y. 451, 458, and authority there cited; McDonald v. Mayor, 58 App. Div. 73, 75, and authorities there cited), and as the referee has found as a fact that the claim of plaintiff's assignor was not a valid lien, it follows that the personal judgment against the defendants cannot be supported in so far as it is founded upon the lien of Raffaele Giordano.
The judgment must be modified in accordance with this opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.
All concurred.
Judgment modified in accordance with opinion per curiam, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.