From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castellano v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 17, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1035 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1035

09-17-2018

MICHAEL A. CASTELLANO, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2018, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 15) of Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, recommending that the court deny the appeal of Michael A. Castellano ("Castellano") from the decision of the administrative law judge denying Castellano's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and it appearing that Castellano has not objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court observing that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Schwab that the decision of the administrative law judge is "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir. 2001), and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 15) of Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED.

2. The decision of the Commissioner denying Castellano's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against Castellano as set forth in paragraph 2.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Castellano v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 17, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1035 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Castellano v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. CASTELLANO, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-1035 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2018)

Citing Cases

Bacon v. Kijakazi

Aug. 24, 2018), report and recommendation adopted, No. 17-1035, 2018 WL 4404654 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 17,…