From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casteel v. Arabas

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 12, 2022
3:20-cv-00381-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 12, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00381-ART-CLB

08-12-2022

SCOTT CASTEEL, Plaintiff, v. ARABAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Office of the Attorney General did not accept service of process on behalf of several defendants, including Vanhorn, Vitale and Famy.

Accordingly, the Clerk shall ISSUE a summons for each of the above-named Defendants and send the same to the U.S. Marshal with the addresses provided under seal. (ECF No. 150) The Clerk shall also SEND sufficient copies of the first amended complaint, (ECF No. 114), the order granting the motion to amend, (ECF No. 110), and this order to the U.S. Marshal for service on the Defendants. The Court will separately provide to the U.S. Marshal a completed USM 285 form for each Defendant.


Summaries of

Casteel v. Arabas

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 12, 2022
3:20-cv-00381-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Casteel v. Arabas

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT CASTEEL, Plaintiff, v. ARABAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 12, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00381-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 12, 2022)