From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castanias v. Lipton

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 24, 2011
C-1-11-296 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2011)

Opinion

C-1-11-296.

August 24, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 17) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 17) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (doc. no. 8) is GRANTED and it is DISMISSED for plaintiff's failure to state a claim against it upon which relief can be granted.

This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings according to law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Castanias v. Lipton

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 24, 2011
C-1-11-296 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Castanias v. Lipton

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER F. CASTANIAS, Plaintiff v. ALECIA C. LIPTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 24, 2011

Citations

C-1-11-296 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

HLFIP Holding, Inc. v. Rutherford Cnty.

E.g., Martinson v. Regents of Univ. of Michigan, 562 Fed.Appx. 365, 370 (6th Cir. 2014) (employing both…

CHS/Community Health Sys. v. Med. Univ. Hosp. Auhtority

This issue is not one of mere formality, because a motion under subsection (b)(6) portends dismissal on the…