Castaneda v. Garland

2 Citing cases

  1. N.A. v. Jaddou

    23-cv-01634-AJB-BGS (S.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)

    Where a plaintiff seeks identical relief under the APA and the Mandamus Act, courts routinely elect to analyze both claims under the APA only. See, e.g., Vaz v. Neal, 33 F.4th 1131, 1135 (9th Cir. 2022); Castaneda v. Garland, 562 F.Supp.3d 545, 561 (CD. Cal. 2021).

  2. Salihi v. Blinken

    23-cv-718-MMA-AHG (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2023)   Cited 4 times
    In Salihi, the plaintiff's story mirrors that of Plaintiff here, where the plaintiff filed an I-730 petition that was originally approved by USCIS and sent to the State Department for travel eligibility determinations only after the complaint was filed.

    Where a plaintiff seeks identical relief under the APA and the Mandamus Act, courts routinely elect to analyze both claims under the APA only. See, e.g., Vaz v. Neal, 33 F.4th 1131, 1135 (9th Cir. 2022); Castaneda v. Garland, 562 F.Supp.3d 545, 561 (CD. Cal. 2021).