From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Castaldi v. Signature Retail Services, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 2, 2015
C 15-00737 JSC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          SCHNEIDER, WALLACE, COTTRELL, KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP, Joshua G. Konecky, Esq., San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

          COMAN & ANDERSON, P.C., Thomas G. Oddo, Esq., Lisle, IL, Attorneys for Defendant.

          ANDERIES & GOMES LLP, Allan J. Gomes, Esq., San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

          JACQUELINE S. CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned attorneys for the parties, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, that the time by which Defendant, Signature Retail Services, Inc., may move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended up to and including June 29, 2015.

         No provision of this Stipulation and Order shall be construed as a waiver of any and all defenses available to Defendant, and any and all such defenses are hereby expressly reserved.

         There has been no previous request for extension of time in connection with this matter.


Summaries of

Castaldi v. Signature Retail Services, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 2, 2015
C 15-00737 JSC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Castaldi v. Signature Retail Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL CASTALDI, Plaintiff, v. SIGNATURE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 2, 2015

Citations

C 15-00737 JSC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)