From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassidy v. Cassidy

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 31, 2017
SC: 155342-44 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 155342-44

10-31-2017

RODENE JOY CASSIDY, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. ROBERT FRANCIS CASSIDY, JR., Defendant/Counterplaintiff-Appellant, and MARY HANSEN, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

155342-44 & (89) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices COA: 328004; 338024; 333319
Genesee CC: 12-306259-DO

On order of the Court, the motion to strike is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Cassidy v. Cassidy

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 31, 2017
SC: 155342-44 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Cassidy v. Cassidy

Case Details

Full title:RODENE JOY CASSIDY, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. ROBERT FRANCIS…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

Citations

SC: 155342-44 (Mich. Oct. 31, 2017)