From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassells v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 10, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2625 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2625 LKK EFB P.

September 10, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's September 4, 2009, motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Cassells v. Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 10, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2625 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Cassells v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:KEITH MICHAEL CASSELLS, Petitioner, v. MIKE KNOWLES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 10, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2625 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2009)