From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassell v. Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 1, 1925
128 A. 40 (Md. 1925)

Opinion

1925

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (STEIN, J.).

Bill by W.B. Cassell against the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the bill, the plaintiff and William Milnes Maloy, People's Counsel, appeal. Appeal dismissed.

The cause was argued, together with that next preceding, before BOND, C.J., PATTISON, URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARKE, and WALSH, JJ.

William Milnes Maloy, People's Counsel, and J. Wallace Bryan, with whom was Thomas H. Robinson, Attorney General, on the brief, for the appellants. Charles McHenry Howard and Shirley Carter, with whom were Piper, Carey Hall, and Venable, Baetjer Howard on the brief, for the appellee.


In this case a subscriber, filing his bill on behalf of an association of subscribers, prayed an injunction against the initiation by the telephone company of its new schedule of rates pending the investigation by the Public Service Commission into the reasonableness of those rates. A demurrer filed by the telephone company was sustained, and this appeal has been taken from the order sustaining it. There was in this case an additional question of the right of the appellant Cassell to have an injunction issued on his application as a subscriber. The appeal in this case, too, is dismissed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed on the dismissal of the appeal in the case of Public Service Commission v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Cassell v. Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 1, 1925
128 A. 40 (Md. 1925)
Case details for

Cassell v. Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:W.B. CASSELL ET AL. vs . CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 1, 1925

Citations

128 A. 40 (Md. 1925)
128 A. 40