Opinion
No. 08-6931.
Submitted: August 14, 2008.
Decided: August 22, 2008.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01024-CCB).
Marc S. Cason, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Marc S. Cason appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101- 12213 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cason v. M.D.P.S.C.S., No. 1:08-cv-01024-CCB (D.Md. May 9, 2008). Because the district court's dismissal was Cason's fourth strike under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2000) ("PLRA"), Cason may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Although the district court's order indicates that its dismissal constituted Cason's third PLRA strike, a review of Cason's numerous lawsuits reveals that Cason was previously issued three strikes. See Cason v. Weeks, No. 08-cv-00946-CCB (D.Md. May 7, 2008), aff'd, 285 Fed.Appx. 75 (4th Cir. 2008) (third strike); Cason v. Maryland Div. of Corr., No. 06-cv-2032 (D. Md. filed Aug. 21, 2006; entered Aug. 22, 2006) (second strike); Cason v. Maryland Div. of Parole and Probation, No. 06-cv-1186 (D.Md. May 17, 2006) (first strike).
AFFIRMED.