From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 23, 2022
350 So. 3d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D22-1514.

11-23-2022

Arnold CASO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.


PER CURIAM .

Because the trial court's exercise of discretion in ruling on the merits of a motion to reduce or mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) is not subject to appellate review, we dismiss this appeal. See Smith v. State, 902 So.2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Graham v. State, 845 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). See also Diaz v. State, 931 So.2d 1002, 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (observing that "an order denying a motion to reduce or mitigate a sentence is not appealable" but may be treated as a petition for writ of certiorari where the trial court denied the motion as untimely without reaching the merits).

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Caso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 23, 2022
350 So. 3d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Caso v. State

Case Details

Full title:Arnold CASO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

350 So. 3d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Citing Cases

Ali v. State

As an initial matter, both parties agree that we do not have jurisdiction to review an order on a motion to…