Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-366 (MTT).
November 8, 2010
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation (Doc. 14) of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles on the Claimant's Complaint (Doc. 1) seeking review, under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c), of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of the Claimant's application for Social Security disability benefits for lack of disability. The Magistrate Judge, having reviewed the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), recommends affirming the decision of the Commissioner because the Commissioner's denial of benefits was supported by substantial evidence. The Claimant has objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 15) and the Court has thoroughly considered the Claimant's Objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Claimant objects.
The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. Because there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that the Claimant is not disabled, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.