From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casillas v. Biggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-1914 DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1914 DAD

01-13-2012

AUDREY CASILLAS, FARHAD MASOUDI, Plaintiffs, v. Michael Biggs, et al. Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants Robert B. Jobe Attorney for the Plaintiff


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: REQUEST TO HOLD

MATTER IN ABEYANCE.

This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs challenge the revocation of visa petitions filed by plaintiff Audrey Casillas by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' (CIS) and seeking an order of declaratory relief that the visa petitions be approved. The parties previously stipulated to hold the matter in abeyance pending an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The result of that administrative appeal was that the matter was returned to CIS, which in turn provided further explanation and then recently returned the matter in its entirety to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The matter is once again freshly pending at the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Because of the likelihood that adjudication by the Board of Immigration Appeals will render this action moot, the parties request that the case be held in abeyance until May 15, 2012, and that all case deadlines be extended to sometime after that date.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: Robert B. Jobe

Robert B. Jobe

Attorney for the Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, good cause having been shown, the matter is held in abeyance pending resolution of the administrative appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The parties are to submit a joint status report no later than May 15, 2012 advising as to the status of the administrative appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Casillas v. Biggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 13, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-1914 DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Casillas v. Biggs

Case Details

Full title:AUDREY CASILLAS, FARHAD MASOUDI, Plaintiffs, v. Michael Biggs, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1914 DAD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2012)