From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cash v. Swingle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 10, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1082 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1082 WBS EFB P

09-10-2012

RANDALL SCOTT CASH, Plaintiff, v. DOROTHY A. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 28, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 28, 2012, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' September 30, 2011 motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 36) is denied.

________________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cash v. Swingle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 10, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1082 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Cash v. Swingle

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL SCOTT CASH, Plaintiff, v. DOROTHY A. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 10, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1082 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2012)