From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Mendoza-Powers

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:07-cv-00274-AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-00274-AWI-TAG (HC).

May 13, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE, AND DENYING PETITIONER'S SECOND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A TRAVERSE (Docs. 12, 13)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 30, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion to extend the time to file a traverse. (Doc. 12). On May 5, 2008, Petitioner filed a second motion for an extension of time to file a traverse. (Doc. 13).

Good cause having been presented to the Court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's first motion for an extension of time to file a traverse (Doc. 12) is GRANTED;

2. Petitioner shall have to and including June 2, 2008 to file a traverse; and

3. Petitioner's second motion for an extension of time to file a traverse (Doc. 13) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Casey v. Mendoza-Powers

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:07-cv-00274-AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Casey v. Mendoza-Powers

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY CASEY, Petitioner, v. K. MENDOZA-POWERS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-00274-AWI-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)