From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Dep't of Corr.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 3, 2020
291 So. 3d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D19-4051

03-03-2020

Brian M. CASEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Brian M. Casey, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Brian M. Casey, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

In light of the circuit court's issuance of an order to show cause why the pleading pending below should not be granted, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n , 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Wolf, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Casey v. Dep't of Corr.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 3, 2020
291 So. 3d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Casey v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN M. CASEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 3, 2020

Citations

291 So. 3d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)