From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Sep 25, 2014
5:14cv190-WS/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 25, 2014)

Opinion

5:14cv190-WS/GRJ

09-25-2014

BRIAN M. CASEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed August 19, 2014. See Doc. 4. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's complaint and this case be dismissed under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 6) to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, the court has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 4) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The plaintiff's motion (doc. 2) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed without prejudice."

5. The clerk shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2014.

s/ __________

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Casey v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Sep 25, 2014
5:14cv190-WS/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Casey v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN M. CASEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2014

Citations

5:14cv190-WS/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 25, 2014)

Citing Cases

Snelling v. Dillhunt

Verbal threats alone are not sufficient to constitute "imminent danger." See Casey v. Crews, No. 5:14cv190,…

Casey v. Trump

Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes bar of § 1915(g), having had six (6) prior civil actions dismissed…