From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 2, 2013
115 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2013)

Opinion

No. SC13–337.

2013-04-2

Brian M. CASEY, Petitioner(s) v. Michael D. CREWS, etc., Respondent(s).


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So.2d 889, 890 (Fla.1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus “is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act”), approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla.1983).

PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Casey v. Crews

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 2, 2013
115 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2013)
Case details for

Casey v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:Brian M. CASEY, Petitioner(s) v. Michael D. CREWS, etc., Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

115 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2013)

Citing Cases

Casey v. State

.3d 822 (Fla.2013) (table) (prohibition petition dismissed); Casey v. State, 130 So.3d 691 (Fla.2013) (table)…

Casey v. State

.3d 822 (Fla.2013) (table) (prohibition petition dismissed); Casey v. State, 130 So.3d 691 (Fla.2013) (table)…