From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 8, 2022
No. 8510-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

8510-21

03-08-2022

Ryan Patrick Casey Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On February 25, 2022, the Court received from the parties in the above-docketed matter a Proposed Stipulated Decision purporting to resolve this litigation. That decision was premised on a Settlement Stipulation filed the same date establishing an overpayment for the underlying 2017 taxable year. However, review shows that the Proposed Stipulated Decision fails to address the addition to tax pursuant to section 6654(a) of the Internal Revenue Code reflected on notice of deficiency.

The premises considered, and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the Proposed Stipulated Decision and Settlement Stipulation, both filed February 25, 2022, are hereby deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case.


Summaries of

Casey v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 8, 2022
No. 8510-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Casey v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Ryan Patrick Casey Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

No. 8510-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 8, 2022)