Cases Affirmed Pursuant, the Rule in State v. Horine

Full title: CASES AFFIRMED PURSUANT, THE RULE IN STATE v. HORINE

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 11, 1988

91 Or. App. 188 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)

91 Or. App. 188

Opinion

753 P.2d 1391 (Or.App. 1988) 91 Or.App. 188 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lance Mitchell WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. CA A46883. Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 11, 1988

       Virginia L. Linder, Salem, for plaintiff-respondent.

       Laura Graser, Portland, for defendant-appellant.

       Under the rule in State v. Horine, 64 Or.App. 532, 669 P.2d 797, rev. den. 296 Or. 237, 675 P.2d 490 (1983), the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

       The prevailing party is respondent.