From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Case v. Baldwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

September, 1932.


Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground of laches, and on the authority of Becker v. Town of Cherry Creek (77 Hun, 11); Hoffman v. Sparling (12 id. 83); Ferm v. N.Y., O. W.R. Co. ( 112 App. Div. 920); Assets Collecting Co. v. Equitable Trust Co. (168 id. 145); Darragh v. McKim (2 Hun, 337). Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Hill, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Case v. Baldwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Case v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:DORCAS A. CASE, Appellant, v. NEWELL W. BALDWIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 771 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Thatcher v. Kitzing

Such relief, to which the defendant is not entitled as a matter of right, should be denied where the motion…

Coffelt v. Bryant, Secretary of State

Furthermore, even an unlawful denial by state action of a right to state political office is not a denial of…