From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cascante v. Kakay

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-25

Olivenya CASCANTE, Plaintiff,v.Bazar KAKAY, et al., Defendants–Appellants,Khalid Mohammed, Defendant–Respondent.

Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for appellants. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., Garden City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for respondent.


Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for appellants.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., Garden City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 26, 2011, which granted defendant Mohammed's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Mohammed established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when the vehicle in which she was riding, which was operated by defendant Kakay and owned by defendant Chester Cab Corp. (collectively Kakay), collided with Mohammed's vehicle. Mohammed demonstrated that Kakay's negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident by submitting, inter alia, deposition testimony of plaintiff and Mohammed indicating that the accident at issue occurred when, while driving northbound, Kakay drove from the left lane into the right lane, without first ascertaining whether he could safely change lanes ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128[a]; Flores v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 599, 888 N.Y.S.2d 27 [2009] ).

In opposition, Kakay failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Although plaintiff's testimony is somewhat unclear as to whether Mohammed's vehicle was traveling northbound and parallel to Kakay's vehicle, or whether it was heading westbound when it entered the intersection where the accident occurred, such testimony does not contradict the evidence establishing that Kakay was negligent and the sole proximate cause of the accident ( see Zummo v. Holmes, 57 A.D.3d 366, 869 N.Y.S.2d 447 [2008]; see also Rivera v. Corbett, 69 A.D.3d 916, 892 N.Y.S.2d 790 [2010] ).


Summaries of

Cascante v. Kakay

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Cascante v. Kakay

Case Details

Full title:Olivenya CASCANTE, Plaintiff,v.Bazar KAKAY, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
931 N.Y.S.2d 295
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7488

Citing Cases

Yasin v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Accordingly, Defendants' evidence establishes a prima facia showing that the emergency doctrine applies and…

Velasquez v. Mta Bus Co.

According to defendant driver, the contact between the front side of the bus and the bicycle occurred while…