From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cascade Holding Corp. v. Peter Barmann Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

January, 1936.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.


Defendants, the trustees in bankruptcy of Peter Barmann Brewing Company, Inc., have appealed from an order denying their motion to set aside a judgment of foreclosure and for leave to interpose an answer. The proof shows the defendants were granted permission by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene and answer and that plaintiff's counsel consented to the making of such an order. Counsel for the defendants notified plaintiff's counsel that he did not intend to interpose an answer. He was given ample opportunity to do so if he so desired. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Cascade Holding Corp. v. Peter Barmann Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Cascade Holding Corp. v. Peter Barmann Brewing Co.

Case Details

Full title:CASCADE HOLDING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. PETER BARMANN BREWING COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Slote v. Cascade Holding Corp.

This was denied. An appeal was taken by the trustees from the order of the Special Term and on January 23,…