From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cary v. Farris

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Dec 5, 2022
1:22-cv-10349 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-10349

12-05-2022

BRYAN CARY, Plaintiff, v. KIM FARRIS, Defendant.


Honorable Patricia T. Morris, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, United States District Judge

On November 14, 2022, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that the undersigned deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment with prejudice. ECF No. 33 at PageID.164.

The R&R states that the parties could object to and seek review of the R&R within 14 days of service. But neither party objected. Therefore, they have waived their right to appeal Judge Morris's findings. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Morris's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 33, is ADOPTED.

Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

This is not a final order and does not close the above-captioned case.


Summaries of

Cary v. Farris

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Dec 5, 2022
1:22-cv-10349 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Cary v. Farris

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN CARY, Plaintiff, v. KIM FARRIS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-10349 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 5, 2022)