From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caruana v. Ranch

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jul 16, 2004
Case No. 2:03-CV-01032 PGC (D. Utah Jul. 16, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2:03-CV-01032 PGC.

July 16, 2004


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS


This diversity case is before the court on defendant Falcon Ridge Ranch's ("Falcon Ridge") motion to dismiss. Falcon Ridge argues that the suit against it should be dismissed for noncompliance with the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act. This argument is without merit.

The crux of Falcon Ridge's motion is its claim to be a "health care provider" under Utah law. However, Falcon Ridge cites no facts in the complaint that would support this claim, nor does it offer any facts outside the complaint that would compel such a finding.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss (#8-1) is DENIED without prejudice. If it becomes clear after discovery that Falcon Ridge is a health care provider under Utah law, the court will entertain any appropriate motion at that time.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Caruana v. Ranch

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jul 16, 2004
Case No. 2:03-CV-01032 PGC (D. Utah Jul. 16, 2004)
Case details for

Caruana v. Ranch

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CARUANA, CHERYL CARUANA, MICHAEL AND CHERYL CARUANA for and on…

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Jul 16, 2004

Citations

Case No. 2:03-CV-01032 PGC (D. Utah Jul. 16, 2004)