From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caruana v. Klipfel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 18, 1987
135 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

December 18, 1987

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Motion for stay denied. Memorandum: This motion by defendant seeks stay of enforcement, pending appeal, of an order of Supreme Court, Erie County, directing an increase in support payments. The motion must be denied. The papers submitted to us do not include the affidavit of plaintiff which was submitted to Supreme Court and was apparently relied upon by that court in making its determination. Since defendant did not submit to Supreme Court an affidavit in response to plaintiff's motion, and did not seek a further opportunity to do so, we must assume, for purposes of this motion only, that plaintiff's uncontested assertions in her moving papers were sufficient to justify the relief granted.


Summaries of

Caruana v. Klipfel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 18, 1987
135 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Caruana v. Klipfel

Case Details

Full title:DIANE CARUANA, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY KLIPFEL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1987

Citations

135 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)