From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Warden, FCI Edgefield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina
Jul 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01257-TMC (D.S.C. Jul. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01257-TMC

07-25-2012

Arthur R. Carter Petitioner v. Warden, FCI Edgefield Respondents


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

[] the plaintiff (name) ___ recover from the defendant (name) ___ the amount of _____ dollars ($ ___), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of _____%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of ___ %, along with costs.

[] the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) _____ recover costs from the plaintiff (name) _____.

[x] other: the plaintiff, Kennith McMullan, shall take nothing of the defendants, Nelson V. Leeke, Byers and Unknown(s), as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this court's orders pursuant to Rule 41(b).

This action was (check one):

[] tried by a jury, the Honorable _____ presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

[] tried by the Honorable _____ presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

[x] decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge, presiding, which dismissed the action without prejudice

LARRY W. PROPES, CLERK OF COURT

A. Buckingham

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Carter v. Warden, FCI Edgefield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina
Jul 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01257-TMC (D.S.C. Jul. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Carter v. Warden, FCI Edgefield

Case Details

Full title:Arthur R. Carter Petitioner v. Warden, FCI Edgefield Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 25, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01257-TMC (D.S.C. Jul. 25, 2012)