From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 18, 1985
685 S.W.2d 812 (Ark. 1985)

Opinion

No. CR 84-163.

Opinion delivered March 18, 1985

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — WITHDRAWAL OF GUILTY PLEA. — A motion to withdraw a guilty plea under Ark. R. Crim. P. 26.1 must be made prior to sentencing.

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court; H.A. Taylor, Judge; affirmed.

John I. Kearney, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Atty Gen., by: Patricia G. Cherry, Asst. Atty Gen., for appellee.


Barry Carter, through his attorney, negotiated a plea of guilty to a first degree murder charge for a sentence of 40 years imprisonment, consecutive with one he was serving. Thirteen days later, with new counsel, Carter sought to set aside the plea and sentence. The ground for the motion was essentially mental incompetence. The trial judge, noting a review of the record, denied the motion without a hearing.

On appeal it is argued that the court should have held a hearing before acting, and, further, the motion should have been granted. It was filed pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 26.1, which provides that a plea may be withdrawn upon a timely motion to correct a manifest injustice. The motion was meritless as a matter of law because it must be made prior to sentencing. Rawls v. State, 264 Ark. 954, 581 S.W.2d 311 (1979); A.R.Cr.P. Rule 26.1 (e).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Carter v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 18, 1985
685 S.W.2d 812 (Ark. 1985)
Case details for

Carter v. State

Case Details

Full title:Barry CARTER v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 18, 1985

Citations

685 S.W.2d 812 (Ark. 1985)
685 S.W.2d 812

Citing Cases

Redding v. State

However, our supreme court has stated that the motion "must be filed prior to sentencing." Carter v. State,…