From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 25, 1960
338 S.W.2d 731 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Opinion


338 S.W.2d 731 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960) Josephine CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 32044. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. May 25, 1960

Motion to Reinstate Appeal Denied June 25, 1960.

[170 Tex.Crim. 124] C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 2 years.

It appears from the transcript that appellant is at large upon recognizance on appeal which is not set out in the transcript.

In the absence of a recognizance or bond substantially in the form required by statute, the appellant not being confined in jail, this court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal. Reid v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 40, 289 S.W.2d 237.

The appeal is dismissed.

On Motion To Reinstate Appeal

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

A supplemental transcript has been forwarded to this Court, but we find the recognizance set out therein to be the same as that contained in the original transcript and which we found not to be in the form required by statute.

Motion to reinstate the appeal is denied.


Summaries of

Carter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 25, 1960
338 S.W.2d 731 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
Case details for

Carter v. State

Case Details

Full title:Josephine CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 25, 1960

Citations

338 S.W.2d 731 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Layman v. State

In the absence of a recognizance or bond substantially in the form required by statute, the appellant not…