(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Carter v. State , 257 Ga. App. 620, 621 (1), 571 S.E.2d 831 (2002). Here, as mentioned above, the State's evidence established all the elements of armed robbery.
See Martin v. State, 213 Ga. App. 146, 147 ( 444 SE2d 103) (1994). Id.; see generally Clark v. State, 279 Ga. 243, 247 (7) ( 611 SE2d 38) (2005); Carter v. State, 257 Ga. App. 620, 622 (1) ( 571 SE2d 831) (2002). See Martin, supra.
Additionally, since the uncontradicted evidence showed completion of the greater offense of armed robbery, the charge on robbery by force was not required. See Jordan v. State, 278 Ga. App. 126, 130 (3) ( 628 SE2d 221) (2006) ("[w]here the uncontradicted evidence shows completion of the offense of armed robbery, and no evidence is presented to the effect that a weapon was not used in the robbery, the defendant is not entitled to a jury charge on the lesser included offense of robbery by intimidation") (punctuation and footnote omitted); Carter v. State, 257 Ga. App. 620, 622 (1) ( 571 SE2d 831) (2002) (same). See Jordan v. State, 239 Ga. 526, 527 (2) ( 238 SE2d 69) (1977).
Jordan v. State, 278 Ga. App. 126, 130 (3) ( 628 SE2d 221) (2006).Carter v. State, 257 Ga. App. 620, 622 (1) ( 571 SE2d 831) (2002). 3. Burden also contends that the trial court erred by failing to charge the jury on self-defense, which he contends was his sole defense.
(a) Since Jones was actively involved in the armed robbery, and since there is nothing to suggest that the robbery was committed without the use of an offensive weapon, there was no justification for a lesser charge of robbery as to him, even though he was not carrying the gun himself. Carter v. State, 257 Ga. App. 620, 621 (1) ( 571 SE2d 831) (2002) (no error in trial court's failure to consider lesser included offense of robbery by intimidation when evidence supported only armed robbery). Thus counsel's failure to request a charge to which Jones was not entitled could not have amounted to ineffective assistance.
(Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Carter v. State, 257 Ga. App. 620, 621 (1) ( 571 SE2d 831) (2002). In Carter, trial counsel discussed at length with the court the jury charges he would have submitted in a jury trial, and the trial court responded that the evidence "would not authorize a jury charge on a lesser included offense."
" Oliver v. State. See also Carter, supra. Carter v. State, 257 Ga. App. 620, 622(1) ( 571 S.E.2d 831) (2002).Oliver v. State, 232 Ga. App. 816, 817(1) ( 503 S.E.2d 28) (1998).