From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Reichard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 6, 2012
2:11cv462 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 6, 2012)

Opinion

2:11cv462

01-06-2012

CORNELIUS CARTER, Plaintiff, v. JOE REICHARD, Counselor; ET AL.; Defendants.


Electronic Mail


District Judge David S. Cercone


Judge Cercone

Magistrate Judge Eddy


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On April 6, 2011, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C, § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on December 15, 2011, (ECF No. 8) recommended that the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the screening provisions promulgated in the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation at his listed address, and was advised that he had until January 3, 2012, to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2012;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the screening provisions promulgated in the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 8) dated December 15,2011, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

_________________________

David Stewart Cercone

United States District Judge

cc: Cornelius Carter

202 Stephanie Drive

Eastern, PA 18045

(Via First Class Mail)


Summaries of

Carter v. Reichard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 6, 2012
2:11cv462 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Carter v. Reichard

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS CARTER, Plaintiff, v. JOE REICHARD, Counselor; ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2012

Citations

2:11cv462 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 6, 2012)